to the problem of big box stores - don't drive there as often! When you do, combine it with other trips. Small and local isn't necessarily the solution... you could easily expend a lot of gas driving all over the city to get to multiple specialized stores as well. Biking isn't necessarily an option if you're buying large objects, and the transportation system in many mid-sized American cities like Minneapolis is woefully inadequate during non-rush hour times.
User login
Navigation
Categories
Recent comments
- Geothermal heat pumps
9 weeks 3 days ago - Now that's what I call mad science!
24 weeks 6 days ago - SimCity Societies sneak-peek
36 weeks 2 days ago - Environmental Blogs
47 weeks 1 day ago - Possible Hazel-Diesel Demo
51 weeks 1 day ago - great commercial :)
1 year 1 week ago - Interesting
1 year 7 weeks ago - Bon voyage!
1 year 8 weeks ago - There's an easy solution...
1 year 9 weeks ago - Wal-Mart
1 year 9 weeks ago
Search
Upcoming events
Blogroll
Links
Browse archives
Syndicate


The big-box stores require customers to travel further, but there are transportation savings because the company needs to supply fewer stores. For example you might locate big boxes along rail lines, further reducing transportation supply costs. Wal-Mart is also experimenting with smaller stores. Customers may eventually make more infrequent trips to big boxes, spending more on each trip, but using a higher-cost neighborhood store for smaller, more frequent purchases.
The article may well be correct that the big-box model is inherently inefficient, but I would at least like to see some discussion of the net efficiency associated with supplying fewer stores as well as hybrid models in which big boxes are combined with smaller local stores.